Miscellaneous Post Transfers

Copyright Carl Janssen My opinion God makes us weak and strong so people can love and be loved. He wants us to depend on him in weakness and being weak provides an opportunity to receive practical kindness and being strong provides an opportunity to give practical kindness, choosing to receive kindness can be a way to give kindness as some people enjoy being kind. I wrote this somewhere else on 2012 January 19

I did not vote for Donald Trump nor Hillary Clinton.  I heard women dump men that voted for Donald Trump.  Good! Real men do not date women that vote democrat, women that vote democrat date loser men. Real men will dump women if they find out they are Democrat supporters.  Chuck Norris tends to support Republican Candidates and Arnold Schwarzenegger ran as a republican, Jessie Ventura ran as a independent not a democrat.  This is not an endorsement for Donald Trump, but if you voted for Hillary Clinton you were a murder supporter

Someone asked a question about dating married people or people with boyfriends or girlfriends on a online forum where people believe in the non aggression principle. Someone responded If a spouse asks you out they figure it is ok I am responding how I would respond to people who believe in the non aggressive principle without appealing to the Bible which may give a greater set of restrictions than those below. If someone agreed with their spouse not to have sex with other people then secretly has sex with other people and their spouse gets a std because of it that is a violation of the non aggression principle because they put them at risk of a std even if "protection" was used, it they don't get a std it is still a violation of the non aggression principle because they still put them at risk.  If a married man or woman asks someone out and you do not know they made whatever agreement that is their problem but if they tell you and you know you are breaking the agree...

Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 January 13 "Corporations" often receive a legal shield from the "government" giving the people that constitute this entity different legal treatment then if they were not working on behalf of a "corporation."  There are certain official restrictions of what the American "government" is permitted to do in the bill of rights.  For example the "government" is not allowed to restrict speech, however a individual who owns a microphone may limit access to who is allowed to use his or her microphone because they personally own it and indirectly prevent that microphone from being used to amplify speech.  It is falsely argued that "corporations" such as Google have a right to restrict how the services they offer are used because they own the online websites by which said services are made available, however google and other "corporations" should not get a exemption to censor speech on their web...

Written by Carl Janssen 2018 January 11 Light has not been observed traveling in perfect vacuums.  This undermines the necessity of both aether and Einstein's relativity The word aether can be replaced with the phrase "medium that is almost a perfect vacuum but is not a perfect vacuum." Traveling through this medium that is almost a perfect vacuum could produce similar mathematical results to that of the Lorentz Aether Transformation.  Einstein's relativity may have borrowed strongly from the Lorentz Aether Transformation except one reason people prefer Einstein's relativity is it does not involve aether, there are also other reasons of preference however including but not limited to it being more widely socially acceptable to refer to Einstein's theories. Albert Einstein  presented the theories of  special relativity  and  general relativity  in publications that either contained no formal references to previous literature, or referred only to a...

Bureaucraticide should be a word added into the dictionary in the year 2018 if it is not already there Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 January 8

Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 January 7 How penal atonement can be misused to excuse wickedness God killing an innocent third party group of people so the guilty maybe forgiven, isn't that the exact opposite of justice punishing the innocent and protecting the guilty when justice should be to protect the innocent.  The innocent die because God has granted people freedom of choice and in doing so he has done so, so strongly that sometimes the innocent are harmed by the wicked not because God desires to harm the innocent as the only way to forgive the wicked.  Sometimes the death of the innocent may change a man away from wickedness when a wicked man hears the protest of the innocent who were killed by the wicked but if the wicked never killed those innocents they could have still changed their way away from wickedness upon hearing the words of the righteous without the death of the innocent.